Loading…
Policy decisions · ATLAS · Review & decide

ATLAS — codification fidelity policy.

Before I re-codify the strategy population under engine v2, I need policy answers — not "what to build" but "how faithful should the v2 codification be to the original source." Each section settles one piece of the policy: the headline tier (strict / source-bounded / permissive), per-component rules, the tuning protocol, the v1-vs-v2 verdict logic, and edge-case handling.

Each task carries a default recommendation. YES accepts the default. MODIFY if you want one of the alternatives (or your own approach). NO means "don't apply this rule at all." Decisions auto-save. Submit when done.

Decisions 22 across 5 sections Default source-bounded Locks in before v2 re-trial
0
Yes
0
No
0
Modify
22
Pending
0 of 22 reviewed

Reference — The three tier-policy options

The headline choice in Section 1. Determines how "faithful to source" v2 codification is:

PolicyBehaviorTrade-off
Strictv2 matches source's literal description. RSI(14) stays RSI(14). No tuning at all.Most defensible. Most likely to under-perform on your specific data.
Source-boundedSource defines the kind of strategy; engine tunes the specifics. RSI period tuned within reasonable bounds, validated on OOS.Default. Most pragmatic. Source structure locked, parameters tuned.
PermissiveSource is a direction; engine substitutes its own choices when it has reason to. May replace RSI with a related indicator if better empirically.Highest upside, highest drift risk. Hardest to claim "this is the source's strategy."

signal_locked=true strategies (SMA-4, Turtle S1, Donchian breakout) override this — they are always strict regardless of the section 1 answer.

Reference — Engine v1 → v2 component delta

The version bump that justifies a graveyard re-trial:

Componentv1 (April harness)v2 (today)
Timeframe stackSingle TFMulti-TF mandatory · explicit roles per TF
Indicator set~8 indicators33 indicators · cross-TF interactions
Gate layerMostly absent8 categories · first-class predicates
Position mgmtHardcoded constantsEmpirical per (strategy, instrument)
Cost modelFlat fee + slippagePath-dependent · funding accrued per interval
RegimeAfter-the-fact labelVector · first-class gate input · bucketed reporting

5 of 6 components are major version bumps. This is the trigger event for a one-time graveyard re-trial.

Reference — Codification fidelity rule

0% reviewed

Submit final decisions?

Once submitted, Claude reads your responses and starts executing. You can still come back and edit, but rerunning the build manually after edits is on you.